Hydro-Quebec to get most of NB Power's assets in controversial $5B deal

Published Thursday October 29th, 2009
Source: CanadaEast.com

FREDERICTON - Hydro - Quebec is swallowing up New Brunswick's public power generator in a multibillion-dollar deal that gives Canada's largest hydroelectricity producer a bigger path to export electricity to energy-hungry U.S. consumers, but leaves other Atlantic provinces worried about the future of their own power companies.

Click to Enlarge
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan
Quebec Premier Jean Charest, left, and New Brunswick Premier Shawn Graham sign a memo of understanding regarding the takeover of NB Power by Hydro-Quebec in Fredericton on Thursday, Oct. 29, 2009.

The tentative agreement would free New Brunswick of its debt-laden utility and put Quebec in an advantageous position to sell electricity to energy-starved markets in the northeastern U.S.

According to a memorandum of understanding, Hydro-Quebec would buy NB Power assets such as transmission lines, offices and most generation facilities, including the Point Lepreau nuclear power plant, for $4.75 billion - an amount equivalent to the utility's debt.

"This agreement ... will also provide Quebec with a strategic geographic position with regards to the markets of Atlantic Canada and New England," Quebec Premier Jean Charest told a news conference after signing the tentative deal Thursday with New Brunswick Premier Shawn Graham.

Graham said the deal would free New Brunswick of a large financial albatross.

"The elimination of NB Power's massive debt will help us attain self-sufficiency and relieve our children and grandchildren of this burden," he said.

"(The deal) creates a true win-win for both provinces, it strengthens the bonds of friendship that unite us, and it will lead to greater economic prosperity in both New Brunswick and Quebec."

But the proposal has sparked opposition from the governments of Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia, who say it would give Hydro-Quebec a monopoly that could hinder power development elsewhere in Atlantic Canada.

"They have a short-term financial problem and they have to get through that, and I understand that," said Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams.

"Newfoundland and Labrador has been in dire financial straits at various points in its existence, but we wouldn't sell off our distribution. ... they've now cut off their future if this in fact goes forward."

Nova Scotia Energy Minister Bill Estabrooks said he was concerned about the potential repercussions the deal would have on Atlantic Canadian efforts to co-operate in selling energy to the U.S., as well as power rates.

"I don't know why New Brunswick would be going down this route - for obvious reasons of politics and finances, but that's not something for me to surmise," Estabrooks said.

Thursday's announcement also triggered fears among Hydro-Quebec's competitors in the United States, with the New England Power Generators Association expressing worries that smaller American utilities would stand little chance in competing against the massive utility.

But Charest tried to assuage such concerns and said he supports the continuation of an open market on the use of transmission lines, adding that he would not stand in the way of other provinces shipping their power to the U.S.

As part of the deal, New Brunswick and Quebec also agreed to a new power rate structure for New Brunswick.

Power rates for NB Power's 370,000 residential customers would be frozen for five years while industrial rates would be reduced as much as 30 per cent to match those in Quebec - a total saving of about $5 billion.

Once the five years are up, future rate increases would be tied to inflation and new generation needs, and would be subject to review by New Brunswick's existing Energy and Utilities Board.

"Ratepayers would see reduced rates to an extent that would have been impossible for NB Power as a stand-alone utility," Graham said.

NB Power was created by New Brunswick's legislature in 1920.

During the 2006 provincial election campaign, Graham promised to maintain the Crown corporation as a publicly owned utility.

David Alward, New Brunswick's Conservative Opposition leader, said the agreement would short-change his province because it would relinquish control of the province's power utility for little in return.

"Delay this deal until after the fixed election date of next September," Alward said. "If not, then go to the people now."

But Graham said there will be opportunity for public debate before the closing date of the deal at the end of March 2010, and a New Brunswick legislature committee will be struck before the end of the year to review the agreement.

Under terms of the memorandum of understanding, New Brunswick would continue to operate fossil fuel plants at Coleson Cove and Belledune, but phase out the facility at Dalhousie.

Hydro-Quebec could also direct the province to shut down two other fossil fuel facilities and earn emission credits in return.

David Coon, policy director for the New Brunswick Conservation Council, said it's a good deal "environmentally."

"By eliminating our fossil fuel plants we will exceed our targets on greenhouse gasses significantly," he said.

But energy analyst Norm Rubin, of the Toronto-based lobby group Energy Probe, has mixed feelings about the deal.

Rubin said all of the borrowing and spending that NB Power has done over the years in hopes of building value has essentially failed.

"They're giving away more or less everything they own and Hydro-Quebec is agreeing to take over the mortgage," Rubin said.

But he said New Brunswickers would benefit from lower power rates and the reduction in industrial rates would make it easier for energy-intensive businesses to set up shop in the province.

 

Comments (22)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Is this how New-Brunswick plans on acheiving it's goal on being self sufficient; by selling itself to it's neighbour? What happens if they Quebec seperate? Who keeps control of NB's energy? How much say will the people have on it's energy supply in the future? You think small NB will be listen or swayed by big Quebec? I see a raw deal on the making. Way to go Shawn.
94
Thumbs Up
11
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Yvon Babineau, Toronto on 29/10/09 09:09:08 AM AST
As long as the rates in NB remain as they are and no hidden charges like the utilities in Ontario and Enbridge tacks on, it may be good for NB, but I still think NB needs to have more control of what happens in NB
55
Thumbs Up
22
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Dave L., Moncton on 29/10/09 09:21:43 AM AST
Step two in making NB P'tit Quebec. Step one was Acadian linguistic rights.
64
Thumbs Up
48
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Ella H., Saint John on 29/10/09 09:36:44 AM AST
"All Quebecers will benefit from this agreement."

Note well, this statement!
The true prize for Hydro Quebec is the transmission lines, everything else will be underfunded, to ensure retirement of those facilities, in part, to ensure the New Brunswick power needs are sourced from Quebec.
Be afraid New Brunswick... be VERY afraid!
76
Thumbs Up
12
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Richard Murray, Picton on 29/10/09 11:47:07 AM AST
"Homeowners will see rates much lower than under the status quo, and we will now share Quebec's competitive industrial rates." Does this mean that our residential rates will be the same rates as the rates in Quebec after the five years even though they are already 60% lower than ours??? NB still needs to be in control of rates, but won't ! - .If its worth this much to Quebec, then whats its worth to a large private company - maybe it should be shopped around to see if we can't fetch a higher price.I feel that Shawn has sold us out for his benefit as he won't be around after next fall...self-sufficiency, Eh ! I was never sold on this idea in the first place...
55
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Donnie C, Moncton on 29/10/09 12:04:19 PM AST
Why does every story have a comment about language when the government makes a move. This is not about acadian ligustic rights, it's about the NB government giving up control of a valuable asset, that may or may not benefit all in NB.

Grow up Ella
62
Thumbs Up
11
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Dave L., Moncton on 29/10/09 12:12:16 PM AST
Wow !!!!!!!!!!Stupidity at its height...we gave all our natural resources away to foreign companies who raped our woodlots and then shut the mills down to increase their power in the papermaking market.Now this crackpot Graham is giving our power away to Quebec to control..........Damn who dropped him on his head when he was born.Good for New Brunwickers be damned , the Irvings maybe . Quebec does not even want to be part of Canada for God sakes...give your heads a shake and Graham ,you just signed your retirement documant--------BYE-BYE...
70
Thumbs Up
12
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
neenie stewart, miramichi on 29/10/09 12:24:08 PM AST
When I heard the first rumours of this, I thought, "no, they couldn't be that stupid." I guess I shouldn't be surprised, with this government. Try to imagine how much Quebec cares about New Brunswick. Right: not at all. Nothing against Quebec particularly, just the size difference. I suspect that every Liberal now sitting in the Legislature, including Mr. Graham, will be returning to their pre-politics lives after the election. Voters' memories may be short, but not that short!
58
Thumbs Up
9
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
GB Bob, Saint John on 29/10/09 12:43:04 PM AST
I'm not surprised that economists and economic development experts almost universally disagree with the individual posters who have made the typo-ridden comments. Disagreeing in principle is much different than disagreeing for justifiable reasons.
8
Thumbs Up
31
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Jon Doe, None on 29/10/09 01:19:02 PM AST
Can't wait until the next election.....but then again,,,,,we are in NB where people forget when it comes time for re-election......Maybe Graham will be a man a put his DEAL to the test with voters.....Ya right
42
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
just me55, Moncton on 29/10/09 01:31:14 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles